A slam dunk gone wrong

We are BG

Brittney Griner is a global star of women’s basketball. She is a two-time Olympic champion, WNBA champion with Phoenix Mercury, six-time Russian Premier League champion. Standing over two meters tall, she has been successful with Yekaterinburg’s UGMK club in Russia.

The US basketball season is played in summer and early autumn, while the Russian season starts in September. This spring, Griner could have secured her seventh win in the Russian championship with UGMK but the club eventually lost the title for the first time in 14 years without her.

Following Griner’s arrest, in March the Yekaterinburg club issued a brief statement. “What happened with Brittney is shocking and troublesome for all members of our team. Our club is ready to facilitate the investigation and provide support to the player who is currently receiving all the required legal assistance.”

The team representatives and leadership only once made it to a court hearing to defend the player and provide a positive profile of her. “Our goal was to speak to the court about her as an athlete and a person. We noted her great role in the club’s success and the development of the whole of Russian basketball. It is thanks to her that we have gone up in the ranking of the Euroleague. We tried to answer the prosecutor’s questions. As of now, Griner’s contract has expired. It happened during the investigation,” Maksim Ryabkov, UGMK Director, told the press about his court appearance.

The US is also on Griner’s case. Players and the WNBA spoke in her defense, Boston Celtics players made statements in June.

Brittney’s wife Cherelle (Griner came out in 2013) in turn said that US President Joe Biden can bring the athlete home.

“I just keep hearing that he [Biden] has the power, she’s [Brittney] a political pawn. So, if they’re holding her because they want you [Biden] to do something, then I want you to do it.”

Height didn’t get in the way

On 1 July, the court began hearing the case of Brittney Griner. Almost all seats in the small courtroom are occupied by representatives of the US Embassy in Russia, including Deputy Chief of Mission Elizabeth Rood. Only four seats are allocated for the press, two for Russian journalists and two others for international media. The rest are offered broadcasting.

The prosecution has already presented evidence. It’s the defence team’s turn now. During the hearing on July 26, the lawyers presented a review of the expert conclusion ordered by the prosecution. The review highlights that the expert conclusion “does not meet the criteria of objectiveness, fairness and comprehensiveness” and “cannot be accepted as scientifically sound.” In particular, it was not determined how much of the narcotic substance was found in the hash oil that Griner had brought into Russia. Meanwhile, prosecutor Nikolai Vlasenko told the court that it was 0.702 grams, “a significant amount.”

Brittney Griner herself pleaded guilty in the beginning of the case and stressed that she had not intended to break Russian laws. She was rushing when packing up for the flight, while the vape cartridges containing hash oil ended up in her bag by accident, according to her.

On 27 July, it was Griner’s turn to testify. The broadcast showed Griner escorted into the defendant’s cage. The basketball player almost did not fit and could not stand upright in it, judge Anna Sotnikova allowed her to testify sitting down. As soon as the hearing began, the broadcast screen went dark with only a barely discernible audio from the courtroom available.

With the help of a translator, Griner told the court that in February she was on holiday in Phoenix, she did not have any games in the off-season. She was travelling to Moscow with layovers. She was meant to fly to Yekaterinburg from Sheremetyevo Airport. The flight lasted 12 hours. “I was exhausted after Covid, the flight was difficult as well. I did not feel well and could barely walk,” Griner said, adding that her return to Russia was not easy in the aftermath of Covid and because of jetlag.

According to her, she tried to make her way into the transit zone in Sheremetyevo when she was stopped at customs control. She was checked by a woman with a sniffer dog and then asked to put her luggage through the scanner. Griner was next asked to open her bag. “The woman took out two cartridges from the suitcase and then signaled to another man,” the defendant continued. That is how the vape story began.

Griner said that although she was provided with a translator only short words were translated to her, with mostly instructions explaining where to put her signature. Moreover, she was not told what her rights were or what the documents she was signing were.

The basketball star admitted that it was hash oil that was found in her luggage, while tests results showed no trace of drugs in her system. When asked why she brought the drugs with her, Griner said that she did not “intentionally transport them and does not understand how these substances ended up in her baggage” and she “did not intend to violate Russian laws.” The player explained that she was prescribed cannabis and got it in a pharmacy in Arizona. “Over the course of my long career, I have sustained a lot of injuries: my spine and knees are injured, I broke my ankle before. The medicinal cannabis is more effective than other painkillers, it does not have side effects like pills,” Griner said. “I only used cannabis for pain relief when my knee was flaring up and only in the off-season when there are no games.”

The defendant said that she understands why she stands accused and realises that she is responsible for what happened. “But I did not intend to smuggle anything and was not going to store prohibited substances.”

Following the testimony, the lawyers asked the court to grant Griner a phone call to the embassy to speak with her family. She has not been able to communicate with her parents or wife while in custody. In turn, the judge told the defendant to write a request for a phone call.

The judge then adjourned the hearing until the evidence, vape cartridges, can be delivered before the court. The evidence is expected to be examined at a later date. Moreover, there is an issue with summoning the expert who provided a review for the defence team. He is summoned again to speak to the court at the next hearing scheduled for 2 August.