While Russian attempts to create a viable national alternative to Wikipedia have generally failed to gain traction, the closest thing to a success story is Ruwiki, a censored online encyclopedia that proudly complies with Russian law and is regularly cleansed of references to so-called “foreign agents”, criticism of the government, and reports of torture in prisons.
“Ruwiki is a Russian organisation, and Russia has its own laws,” Ruwiki director Vladimir Medeyko told Novaya Gazeta Europe in July. Medeyko was the head of Wikimedia RU, the nonprofit Wikimedia chapter formed to maintain and monitor Russian-language Wikipedia pages, until it shut down amid political pressure in late 2023.
Ruwiki’s launch had been announced six months earlier, with beta testing starting a month after that. Ruwiki draws directly on the existing 1.9 million Wikipedia articles in Russian, but then automatically alters them to comply with Russian law.
Medeyko said that Ruwiki’s process of adaptation begins with “deleting everything that raises even the slightest doubt” and later involves “consultation with lawyers”, adding that he believed Wikipedia to have “reliability and neutrality” issues, and that these problems had only intensified since the start of the war in Ukraine.
But Ruwiki sounds its own alarms where “reliability and neutrality” are concerned, with some Russian Wikipedia articles simply disappearing on the new platform; independent news outlet Bumaga reported that Ruwiki was missing about 110 Wikipedia articles about the war. Other articles on sensitive topics appear to have undergone excessive rewriting.
Graphic designer Konstantin Konovalov tabulated the number of characters changed in Ruwiki articles and sorted the data by topic, finding that 205,000 characters were changed in articles about freedom of speech, 158,000 were altered in articles about human rights, 96,000 were changed in articles about political prisoners, and 71,000 were changed in articles about censorship in Russia.
The degree to which texts are altered varies. In an article about the film Navalny, for example, the Ruwiki page both downplayed the mention of Navalny’s 2020 poisoning and referred to Navalny exclusively as a “blogger,” rather than a “politician”, the term used in the original Wikipedia article.
In an article on George Orwell’s 1984, Ruwiki censors removed the section about the Ministry of Truth, which the original Wikipedia page had described as “continuously falsifying various pieces of information (statistics, historical facts)”.